DefiLlama and DappRadar Listing Support for Web3 Projects

Is a DefiLlama or DappRadar listing the right next step?

A listing is most useful when a project already has a working product and can explain what users will find on the platform. DefiLlama work here concerns a TVL listing; DappRadar work concerns a dApp listing. They are distinct tasks, so we first establish which profile supports your immediate business need rather than treating both as interchangeable badges.

For a DeFi protocol, clarify which product or protocol the TVL information should represent and where a reviewer can inspect the underlying public information. For a dApp, prepare a concise description of what it does, the supported network or networks, and a direct route to the product. These are preparation points for our review, not claims about platform eligibility rules.

A useful first check is whether your public materials tell the same story: project name, product description, network details, website, and any data or documentation links should be consistent. If the project also needs other directories, our broader listings and verification support can be considered alongside this scope.

What is different about DefiLlama TVL and DappRadar dApp listings?

The distinction is the information each listing is meant to present: DefiLlama is relevant to a protocol’s TVL listing, while DappRadar is relevant to a dApp profile. We plan the evidence and copy for each destination separately, so a single generic project description does not have to carry every detail.

For the DefiLlama work, the project team should be able to point us to the protocol information it wants reviewed and explain how that information relates to the product. For DappRadar, we check that the app destination works and that the description makes the product understandable without relying on promotional claims. Where you are also planning a CoinGecko listing or a CoinMarketCap listing, we keep those separate: each platform has its own submission context and public profile.

What should you prepare before a listing submission?

A clean submission starts with a compact, verifiable project pack. Before work begins, we ask for the canonical project name, website, product link, a short factual description, supported networks, and the best public documentation or data references. For a TVL listing, include the protocol details and public sources that let us understand the figures and their scope. For a dApp profile, provide a working app route and explain the user task it supports.

Our named review step is the listing-readiness check. We compare the supplied details across the project website, documentation, app, and any data references; flag inconsistencies; and return a concise list of missing or unclear items. This catches avoidable friction before submission, such as differing project names, dead links, or descriptions that do not match the live product.

To make that review efficient, send:

• The project’s official website and product or app link.
• Network and protocol details relevant to the requested listing.
• Public documentation and data references, with any access instructions.
• The exact listing scope: DefiLlama, DappRadar, or both.

If an existing token profile needs a separate correction rather than a new listing, consider circulating supply verification or contract migration and rebranding updates where relevant.

What does the DefiLlama and DappRadar listing service include?

The service gives your team an organized submission process and a clear view of what was prepared, sent, and followed up. We agree the platform scope first, then tailor the project pack to the destination instead of implying that one submission automatically covers both listings.

The agreed work may include:

• Intake and scope confirmation for the requested platform or platforms.
• A listing-readiness check of supplied project facts, links, and supporting material.
• Editing or organizing factual descriptions and submission materials for clarity.
• Submission coordination using the project information and access authorized by your team.
• Follow-up tracking and a closeout report that records the work completed and any platform response received.

The report is designed to be useful internally: it identifies the destination, the materials used, the submission or follow-up status, and any next action requested from your team. We do not present a submitted form as a published listing. If your project needs visibility work beyond directory profiles, we can discuss whether a DEX listing and liquidity setup belongs in a separate plan; it is not bundled into this service by default.

How does the listing work move from intake to follow-up?

The process moves from scope and evidence review to submission coordination and a documented handoff. You retain control of project facts and provide approval where a statement, link, or access permission needs your confirmation.

We begin with a kickoff checklist covering the platform, product or protocol, public references, and the person who can answer technical questions. After the listing-readiness check, we return any gaps for your team to resolve. Once the materials are approved, we prepare the agreed submission and coordinate follow-up; we then share a status report so your team can see what happened and what remains open.

The timeline is set after intake because the amount of preparation varies with the number of destinations, the state of public documentation, and how quickly the project team can clarify details. We share the proposed sequence before work starts rather than promising a date before seeing the materials. The service starts from $450 / project, with final scope confirmed after the initial review. You can review the wider pricing information or contact us with your project links and requested destination.

What can the platforms decide after you submit?

The platforms control whether a listing is accepted, how submitted information is reviewed, and how a published profile is displayed or maintained. In particular, DefiLlama controls whether and how TVL information appears, while DappRadar controls whether and how a dApp profile is published; neither approval, placement, nor a particular display outcome can be guaranteed by an outside service provider.

Our responsibility is to deliver the agreed preparation, submission coordination, and follow-up, and to keep the project team informed about platform responses. We do not alter project data to fit a desired presentation. If a platform asks for clarification or additional material, we relay the request and help organize a factual response based on information your team can support.

If the issue is not a new listing but an inaccurate or incomplete existing profile, tell us what is currently visible and what evidence supports the correction. We can then determine whether this service fits or whether a focused profile remediation request is more appropriate. A clear distinction between a new listing and a correction helps prevent the team from preparing the wrong materials.

Prices

Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.

How it works

1. Confirm the destinationChoose DefiLlama, DappRadar, or both, and state what the listing should represent. We confirm the agreed scope before collecting materials.
2. Send the project packShare official links, product or protocol details, public data references, and a contact for technical questions.
3. Complete the readiness checkWe compare the supplied facts and links, then return any gaps or inconsistencies for your team to resolve.
4. Approve and coordinate submissionYou confirm the factual materials; we prepare and coordinate the agreed submission and follow-up.
5. Receive the status reportWe record the work completed, platform responses received, and any next action needed from your team.