Explorer token info and logo update for your project

When does an explorer token page need an update?

An explorer token page needs attention when its visible information no longer matches the project or leaves basic questions unanswered. A new logo, changed website or social account, a rebrand, or an incomplete token profile can all be reasons to review what appears on the relevant explorer.

This service is for teams that want a consistent, verifiable presentation across Etherscan, BscScan, Solscan or Tonviewer. It does not replace contract verification, an exchange listing or an independent security review. The first decision is whether the issue concerns the token’s public information, the contract itself, or a separate listing profile. If a migration or rebrand is involved, establish which contract and project name should be treated as current before preparing any update. Our contract migration and rebranding update support can help coordinate related profile changes.

Before kickoff, gather:

• The exact contract address and its network.
• The current project name and a short, consistent description.
• The approved logo file and official website and social links.
• Any existing explorer page or prior submission details.

This gives us a defined source of truth and reduces the chance of submitting conflicting identity information.

Which token details should you align across explorers?

Align the details that identify the project: token name, logo, concise description, website and official social links. The aim is not to make every explorer page look identical; it is to make the information you provide coherent and easy to check against the project’s own channels.

We check that the links resolve to destinations your team controls or officially represents, and flag mismatched names or outdated destinations before submission. For changes to a separate DEX profile, use the dedicated DEXTools and DEXScreener profile update service, rather than assuming an explorer change will update other platforms. If you are also preparing wider directory coverage, the listings and verification overview helps distinguish these workstreams.

How do we prepare an explorer-specific token info update?

We prepare the update around the selected explorer and the information it makes available for submission. The project supplies the authoritative details; we check them for consistency, organize the supporting materials and coordinate the applicable submission route instead of treating all four explorers as one shared form.

Our named review step is the Explorer identity check. We compare the contract reference, project name, logo, description and social destinations as one set. If the materials point to different names, domains or accounts, we pause and ask the project contact to confirm the correct version before submission. That is more useful than forwarding a bundle with unresolved contradictions.

The working sequence is:

• Confirm which explorer pages and contract address are in scope.
• Check that every supplied link and identity detail matches the approved project source.
• Prepare the information and coordinate the explorer-specific submission.
• Record the submission status and any response or follow-up needed.

For projects that also need wallet-facing token presentation, our wallet logo and token list inclusion support is a separate workstream. Keeping these tasks distinct makes it easier to see which platform has received which materials.

What does the explorer update service include?

The service includes a scoped review of token identity materials, preparation of the information for the explorers selected at kickoff, submission coordination and a concise status report. We agree the scope with you before work begins, so the project knows which contract, explorer pages and assets are being handled.

The reporting format is a submission log: explorer, page or contract reference, materials sent, current status and any requested follow-up. This gives your team a practical record to share internally and a clear place to resolve questions. It also separates work completed by us from actions or decisions that remain with the project.

To keep the review focused, nominate one contact who can approve the final project name, description, logo and links. Send the final logo rather than a set of undecided options, and identify any old social accounts that should not appear. If details are still changing, we can first help establish the approved information set, then proceed when it is ready. Related profile corrections on data platforms are handled separately; for example, CoinMarketCap community verification addresses a different profile and process.

What can affect an update on Etherscan, BscScan, Solscan or Tonviewer?

An explorer update is complete from our side when the agreed materials have been prepared and the submission work recorded; the visible result remains specific to each explorer. Different explorers may request different information or handle a submission through different routes, so we check the applicable requirements for the selected platform rather than promising identical forms or display behavior.

Each explorer controls its own review, approval and publication, including whether submitted information is accepted and when a page reflects a change. We cannot promise approval or a particular publication time; we can promise the agreed preparation, submission coordination and a clear account of the status.

You can make the handoff easier by keeping the approved logo and social links in one shared folder, confirming the exact contract address, and making an authorized project contact available for questions. If an explorer asks for clarification, we relay the request and help organize a response based on information you confirm. Avoid sending private keys or other signing credentials as part of a profile update; the initial scope is public token information and identity materials.

How should explorer updates fit into a wider listing plan?

Explorer information is one part of a project’s public reference layer. If your immediate task is correcting a token’s name, logo or official links on a chain explorer, handle that as its own workstream; if the goal is wider discovery, plan the additional directory and profile submissions separately.

A practical order is to confirm the canonical project identity first, prepare the explorer update second, then reuse the same approved information when coordinating other profiles. This avoids sending different descriptions or outdated social destinations to separate platforms. For a directory-first objective, compare the separate CoinGecko listing service and other crypto tracker listings; their scope is not automatically included in explorer work.

At kickoff, we use a short checklist covering contract and network, target explorer pages, approved name and description, logo, live official links, project contact and any rebrand context. Send us that checklist with your preferred explorers and the contract address. We will review the scope, flag any gaps in the materials and confirm the next submission steps with you.

Prices

Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.

How it works

1. Confirm scopeShare the contract address, network, target explorers and the reason for the update. We confirm which pages and materials are in scope.
2. Approve the identity setProvide the final name, description, logo and official links. We run the Explorer identity check and raise inconsistencies before submission.
3. Prepare and coordinateWe organize the agreed information for each selected explorer and coordinate the relevant submission route.
4. Track statusWe share a submission log and relay any follow-up request so your authorized contact can confirm the necessary details.